The 2018 report also includes a list of "waters of concern," waters that "while not currently included on the 303(d) List of Impaired Waters, . . . have the potential to be listed as impaired in 2020," according to DHEC. This year's list includes 166 sites, with sites in all eight major river basins in South Carolina, that are listed as waters of concern for aquatic life use support because of lead.
Five sites in the Congaree Riverkeeper watersheds are listed as waters of concern for aquatic life use support because of lead (PB).
- B-320 - BIG CEDAR CK AT SC 215 - AL - PB
- RS-11041 - CRIMS CREEK AT BRIDGE AT S-36-170; 2.7 MI E OF POMARIA - AL - PB
- RS-09323 - LIGHTWOOD KNOT BRANCH AT TRENHOLM RD EXTENSION - AL - PB
- RS-09312 - CEDAR CREEK AT BRIDGE ON S-40-2561 NEAR BEULAH CHURCH AND GATE TO MCINTYRE AIRBASE - AL - PB
- RS-10408 - BUCKHEAD CK AT SC-419 - AL - PB
It is important to note that these waters of concern (as well as the three sites listed as impaired for lead) are for aquatic life use, meaning that the lead levels may prevent the waters from "providing for the survival and propagation of a balanced indigenous aquatic community of fauna and flora." For pollutants, like lead and other heavy metals, there are acute and/or chronic aquatic life criterion that DHEC compares the data to. Put simply, there may be too much lead in the water for the critters that live in these impaired rivers, streams, and lakes to thrive.
Regarding the 303(d) List release, DHEC stated that it does not believe there are any public health concerns related to these lead impairments or waters of concern. That being said, DHEC must make the case to the public that there is not a public health risk and provide all the supporting data for this claim.
Both the new lead impairments and the waters of concern raise several questions, including:
- What is/are the source(s) of the lead? Will DHEC conduct a lead source study?
- Since some of the data used to list these sites goes back almost a decade, when did DHEC know that there were lead concerns, and why weren't these sites listed years earlier?